Most smart phones, tablets and laptops are designed and marketed to last for about two years.
(Pause now and imagine billions of mobile phone, iPod and tablet users across the globe dumping their devices on a two-year cycle.)
There are, however, small things we can do to extend the life of the lithium-ion batteries inside our devices, which could extend the life of the devices themselves. (Check your device manufacturer’s specific recommendations. Here’s Apple’s info.)
- Avoid extreme ambient temperatures, especially those above 95F/35C — don’t leave your device in a hot car, for example, and don’t use a case that allows heat to build up when the device is charging
- Aim for moderate charging — regularly allow your battery to run down to 25%, but avoid allowing the battery to go to 0%; you don’t need to worry about over-charging
- Lower your battery demand —keep WiFi on at all times (accessing WiFi uses less power than accessing cellular data), reduce display brightness, select low power mode or manually disable background applications, and disconnect peripherals and quit applications not in use
- Avoid ultra-fast chargers
- Update to the latest software
The “why” part of this post is at least two-fold.
One, most of us avoid thinking about what happens to our e-waste because we feel powerless. However, we can’t even begin to organize our power as consumers unless we become aware of the problems created by our e-waste. Scientific American magazine outlines the issues well in this blog post.
Two, the money we spend on devices goes somewhere. It goes to employees and middle class shareholders of companies like Samsung and Apple. It goes to tremendously wealthy shareholders. And it goes to support and grow the tech industry. Currently, two of those groups are well-organized and politically influential around their particular interests. We consumers can organize, too, to demand less exploitative and less environmentally damaging products and packaging. Greenpeace International and the International Campaign for Responsible Technology are two of many groups advocating for greener electronics.
Lastly, look for the least bad way to dispose of your e-waste. In the Twin Cities, TechDump is one option.
I spent most of the last year living in another country and, as expat families around us packed up to move home at the end of their sabbatical year, I heard the same exclamation many times: “I can’t believe how much stuff we have!” And each time my comment was, “Well, you’ve been living here.”
We all have a baseline of stuff that helps us enjoy life. We also have a point beyond which stuff becomes a burden. And in my mind, the journey of simplifying includes figuring out where the tipping point lies for us as individuals and families, and making decisions so we get maximum benefit and minimum burden from stuff.
“Simplifying” (which also gets called “minimalism”) is interpreted in other ways, too, and it could be useful to compare what you’re doing against those other interpretations to make sure your actions are in alignment with the life you want to live. In this post I shared a link to New York Times columnist David Brooks’s thoughts on “the evolution of simplicity,” and here’s a piece by another author fed up with “the oppressive gospel of ‘minimalism’.”
No matter the interpretation, those of us with time and energy to think about simplifying and make different choices are very fortunate.
If you’re in the Twin Cities and want to find a good home for unused fiber arts materials−or if you’re looking for some good deals on materials−mark your calendar!
16th Annual World’s Largest Textile Garage Sale in Minneapolis — Saturday, April 9, 2016
The Textile Center will accept donations between 10am-7pm on Thursday, April 7 at the University of Minnesota ReUse Center warehouse in Minneapolis.
- thread, notions, and buttons
- patterns, magazines, and books
- sewing machines, tools, looms, and specialty equipment
The Textile Center is a non-profit organization that displays works of fiber art in its gallery, rents studio space, offers classes, and sells books, supplies, and finished work. The garage sale is their largest fundraiser.
In a post on Becoming Minimalist, Johsua Becker describes the American gift-giving season this way:
Over the next several weeks, new possessions will enter homes at an alarming rate. The new possessions will arrive in stockings, gift bags, gift wrap, and envelopes. And the new products will come in various forms: electronics, clothes, books, toys, jewelry, gift cards, video games, decorations, DVD’s, and cookware. In America alone, over $600 billion dollars will be spent on retail goods during the months of November and December.
Some gifts will meet legitimate needs. But most gifts during the holiday season are purchased to satisfy wants: another new doll for your daughter, a new video game system for your son, or a K-cup coffee maker for the parents. Worse yet, many of the gifts we give will satisfy neither needs or wants—instead, they will only satisfy an obligation.
It doesn’t have to be that way. We can instead choose to give “gifts of meaning,” as New York Times editorial columnist Nicholas Kristof recently wrote, by giving a gift to someone who truly needs it.
To make things easy, Kristof shared a list of nearly a dozen American and international non-profit organizations that he thinks are truly improving people’s lives. If you want a third-party opinion on another charity, CharityNavigator.org rates the financial health and accountability/transparency of organizations based in the U.S. You can read more about Charity Navigator’s methodology on their web site.
Three years ago we were fortunate to be able to leave our jobs for a few months and live in another country. That experience, and the fresh perspective it gave us, was the spark that ignited our efforts to live better with less.
Now we are once again living outside the country, this time for a school year. It’s a dream that was only possible because we’d freed up time (for planning and preparation, for extra hours at work), reduced our living expenses, and reduced the amount of stuff we needed to put into storage during our absence.
It’s been interesting to keep working toward our goals while living in a totally different context. There are many things we just don’t have to think about. For example, before our move we went from two cars to zero, which automatically reduces our carbon footprint and our monthly expenses, and ensures that we get outdoor exercise every day. The higher cost of energy where we’re living is helping us be more mindful of how we use electricity and oil. And we’re figuring out how we can buy locally grown and organic food products in our new city. We’re also willfully unemployed, which for us means an exchange of job-related stress for ample sleep, exercise, community education classes, and volunteering. Like I said, it’s a dream.
Although our return to the U.S. is still a ways off, we’ve started talking about what else we can change once we’re back. A priority will be choosing a place to live (renting again) where we can use public transportation and our feet to get around so that we only need one car. I’ll also be looking for a job where I can prioritize my mental and physical health. My hope is that we can offset a lower salary (assuming that will be a compromise) by reducing expenses in ways that connect back to our goals, for example by cooking more at home and having only one car.
What goals—daily or long-term—are you trying to achieve by simplifying?
Today’s New York Times features a thoughtful reflection by op-ed writer David Brooks on “the evolution of simplicity.”
In his essay Brooks describes today’s impulse to simplify and streamline as stemming in part from a desire to lessen the “ache from all the scattered shallowness.” He also lasers in on efforts that are called simplifying but mainly boil down to “a more refined, organic, locally grown and morally status-building form of materialism.”
For all of us trying to simplify, I think it helps to first articulate why we’re doing it. If we’re moving toward “unity of purpose,” as Brooks so eloquently writes, what do we truly need to do to get there?